CircularsNews
March 2013

Australian Pollution Law - Oil Pollution Indemnity Clause for Penalties and Fines

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was extended to cover emissions from shipping as of 1st January 2024.

The EU ETS is limited by a 'cap' on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall.

Each allowance gives the holder the right to emit:

  • One tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or;
  • The equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
  • The price of one ton of CO2 allowance under the EU ETS has fluctuated between EUR 60 and almost EUR 100 in the past two years. The total cost of emissions will vary based on the cost of the allowance at the time of purchase, the vessel’s emissions profile and the total volume of voyages performed within the EU ETS area. The below is for illustration purposes:
  • ~A 30.000 GT passenger ship has total emissions of 20.000 tonnes in a reporting year, of which 9.000 are within the EU, 7.000 at berth within the EU and 4.000 are between the EU and an outside port. The average price of the allowance is EUR 75 per tonne. The total cost would be as follows:
  • ~~9.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 675.000
  • ~~7.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 525.000
  • ~~4.000 * EUR 75 * 50% = EUR 150.000
  • ~~Total = EUR 1.350.000 (of which 40% is payable in 2024)
  • For 2024, a 60% rebate is admitted to the vessels involved. However, this is reduced to 30% in 2025, before payment is due for 100% with effect from 2026.
  • Emissions reporting is done for each individual ship, where the ship submits their data to a verifier (such as a class society) which in turns allows the shipowner to issue a verified company emissions report. This report is then submitted to the administering authority, and it is this data that informs what emission allowances need to be surrendered to the authority.
  • The sanctions for non- compliance are severe, and in the case of a ship that has failed to comply with the monitoring and reporting obligations for two or more consecutive reporting periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure compliance, the competent authority of an EEA port of entry may issue an expulsion order. Where such a ship flies the flag of an EEA country and enters or is found in one of its ports, the country concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the company fulfils its monitoring and reporting obligations.
  • Per the EU’s Implementing Regulation, it is the Shipowner who remains ultimately responsible for complying with the EU ETS system.

There are a number of great resources on the regulatory and practical aspects of the system – none better than the EU’s own:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087-20230605

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en

Sayin Ilgili,

Uluslararasi Grup P&I Klupleri bahse konu ile ilgili asagidaki sirkuleri yayinlamistir. Avustralya’da 28 Aralik 2012 tarihinde meydana gelen düzenleme ile çevre kirliligi cezalarinin artmasinin ardindan charter party’lerde kullanilmasi için asagidaki kloz önerilmektedir. Önerilen charter party klozu çevre kirliligi sorumlulugunu armatör ve kiraci arasnda ayristirmak ve daha sonra savunma masraflarini paylastirmak ve Avustralyadaki ceza uygulamasina paralel bir düzenleme yapmaya yöneliktir.

Ayrica klup P&I ve FDD kurallari da söz konusu çevre kirliligi sorumlulugunun çevre kirlilik cezasi uygulanmasa dahi savunma masraflarini teminat altina almak amaci ile ilave madde ile genisletilmistir.

Detayli açiklamayi asagida bilgilerinize sunariz.

In October 2012, an International Group recommended charterparty clause was drafted to address the concerns raised by owners and charterers in respect of the amendments to Australian legislation introducing increased penalties for pollution from ships and damage to the Marine environment.  Since the recommended clause was circulated to Members, there have been further developments in relation to the Australian legislation and further consideration of the wording of the recommended clause, which has been updated as attached and further explained below.

Increase in the amount of penalties

On 28 December 2012, a new regulation came into force in Australia escalating the monetary value of financial penalties for Federal offences.  The increase in penalty unit valuations is only applicable to offences committed on or after 28 December 2012.

The changes affect fines calculated on penalty units, such as fines imposed under the Protection of the Sea Act 1983, which imposes fines ranging from 500 penalty units to 20,000 penalty units for the offence of discharging oil or oily mixtures into the sea.

Under the previous penalty unit calculation, this resulted in maximum fines of AUD 2.2 million for an individual and AUD 11 million for a corporation.  Under the new penalty unit calculation, the applicable maximum fines are now AUD 3.4 million for an individual and AUD 17 million for a corporation.

Amendments to the International Group recommended clause and explanatory notes

·         Legal/Defence costs

A new subparagraph (b) iii. has been inserted to address the concerns that prosecution legal costs and/or expenses might be passed onto the defending party.  Subparagraph (b) iii. clarifies that the indemnity in the recommended clause extends to the recovery of any reasonable legal costs and/or other expenses incurred by or awarded against either party in respect of any proceedings instituted against them for the imposition of any fine or other penalty, in circumstances set out in subparagraph (b), irrespective of whether any fine or other penalty is actually imposed.

·         Indemnity in the event of contributory fault

The proviso to subparagraphs (b) i. and ii. has been amended to specifically address the consequences of liability arising in circumstances where there is contributory fault on the part of the party seeking indemnity. The amendment restricts the amount of the recovery where there is contributory fault, provided this is not prohibited under the law governing the charterparty.

The recommended clause and explanatory notes are attached below.

This Circular supersedes Circular No 2012/034.

Should Members have any questions they should contact the Managers in the normal way.

All Clubs in the International Group of P&I Clubs have issued similar circulars.

COLIN TRAPPE

DIRECTOR - North Insurance Management Limited

As Managers on behalf of the North of England P&I Association Limited

ANNEX

OIL POLLUTION INDEMNITY CLAUSE FOR PENALTIES AND FINES

(a) Subject to the terms of this Charterparty, as between Owners and Charterers, in the event of an oil pollution incident involving any discharge or threat of discharge of oil, oily mixture, or oily residue from the Vessel (the "Pollution Incident"), Owners shall have sole responsibility for responding to the Pollution Incident as may be required of the vessel interests by applicable law or regulation.

(b) Without prejudice to the above, as between the parties it is hereby agreed that:

i. Owners shall indemnify, defend and hold Charterers harmless in respect of any liability for criminal fine or civil penalty arising out of or in connection with a Pollution Incident, to the extent that such Pollution Incident results from a negligent act or omission, or breach of this Charterparty by Owners, their servants or agents,

ii. Charterers shall indemnify, defend and hold Owners harmless in respect of any liability for criminal fine or civil penalty arising out of or in connection with a Pollution Incident, to the extent that such Pollution Incident results from a negligent act or omission, or breach of this Charterparty by Charterers, their servants or agents,

provided always that if such fine or penalty has been imposed by reason wholly or partly of any fault of the party seeking the indemnity, the amount of the indemnity shall be limited accordingly and further provided that the law governing the Charterparty does not prohibit recovery of such fines.

iii. The rights of Owners and Charterers under this clause shall extend to and include an indemnity in respect of any reasonable legal costs and/or other expenses incurred by or awarded against them in respect of any proceedings instituted against them for the imposition of any fine or other penalty in circumstances set out in paragraph (b), irrespective of whether any fine or other penalty is actually imposed.

(c) Nothing in this Clause shall prejudice any right of recourse of either party, or any defences or right to limit liability under any applicable law.

(d) Charterers shall procure that this Clause be incorporated into all sub-charters and contracts of carriage issued pursuant to this Charterparty.

EXPLANATORY NOTES

It is understood that, under the revised Australian law, charterers can be strictly liable for penalties and fines imposed on them as a result of a pollution or threat of pollution caused by the act or negligence of the owner (eg navigational error).  Conversely, owners can be strictly liable for penalties and fines imposed on them as a result of a pollution or threat of pollution caused by the act or negligence of the charterer (eg unsafe berth).  As this involves circumstances beyond owners' and charterers' control, a charterparty clause is recommended to achieve the effect that whoever causes the Pollution Incident should bear the criminal fines or penalties through indemnification.

Under the clause, owners have overall responsibility for responding to a discharge or threat of discharge of oil, oily mixture or oily residue (subparagraph (a)). This is in line with the Australian legislation and with the international compensation regime.

The indemnity in subparagraphs (b) i. and ii. is designed to protect owners and charterers by incorporating an equal indemnity by the party whose negligent act or omission, or breach of charterparty, causes pollution or threat of pollution.

The proviso to subparagraphs (b) (i) and (ii) ensures that Club cover is not prejudiced on the grounds that liability has been contractually assumed by virtue of the clause in circumstances where there may not be an underlying legal liability.  The proviso restricts the amount of recovery where there is contributory fault.  The recovery of fines under the clause is also subject to such recovery not being prohibited under the law governing the charterparty.

The indemnity in this clause extends to the recovery of any reasonable legal costs and/or other expenses incurred by or awarded against either party in respect of any proceedings instituted against them for the imposition of any fine or other penalty in circumstances set out in subparagraph (b) irrespective of whether any fine or other penalty is actually imposed.

The indemnity in this clause will not respond to the situation where the pollution or threat of pollution is entirely caused by a third party's act, without involving any act of the owner or of the charterer, but where the owner or charterer still incurs the penalty or fine under the new Australian law.

The clause only addresses the specific situation of criminal fines and civil penalties, not civil liability which is within the sphere of the Conventions.

Any right of recourse of either party, defence or right to limit is preserved under subparagraph (c).

Subparagraph (d) is designed to ensure that the same recovery and indemnity provisions apply where there is a charterparty chain.

No items found.