CircularsNews
January 2011

Nigeria - Motherships for Piracy

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was extended to cover emissions from shipping as of 1st January 2024.

The EU ETS is limited by a 'cap' on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall.

Each allowance gives the holder the right to emit:

  • One tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or;
  • The equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
  • The price of one ton of CO2 allowance under the EU ETS has fluctuated between EUR 60 and almost EUR 100 in the past two years. The total cost of emissions will vary based on the cost of the allowance at the time of purchase, the vessel’s emissions profile and the total volume of voyages performed within the EU ETS area. The below is for illustration purposes:
  • ~A 30.000 GT passenger ship has total emissions of 20.000 tonnes in a reporting year, of which 9.000 are within the EU, 7.000 at berth within the EU and 4.000 are between the EU and an outside port. The average price of the allowance is EUR 75 per tonne. The total cost would be as follows:
  • ~~9.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 675.000
  • ~~7.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 525.000
  • ~~4.000 * EUR 75 * 50% = EUR 150.000
  • ~~Total = EUR 1.350.000 (of which 40% is payable in 2024)
  • For 2024, a 60% rebate is admitted to the vessels involved. However, this is reduced to 30% in 2025, before payment is due for 100% with effect from 2026.
  • Emissions reporting is done for each individual ship, where the ship submits their data to a verifier (such as a class society) which in turns allows the shipowner to issue a verified company emissions report. This report is then submitted to the administering authority, and it is this data that informs what emission allowances need to be surrendered to the authority.
  • The sanctions for non- compliance are severe, and in the case of a ship that has failed to comply with the monitoring and reporting obligations for two or more consecutive reporting periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure compliance, the competent authority of an EEA port of entry may issue an expulsion order. Where such a ship flies the flag of an EEA country and enters or is found in one of its ports, the country concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the company fulfils its monitoring and reporting obligations.
  • Per the EU’s Implementing Regulation, it is the Shipowner who remains ultimately responsible for complying with the EU ETS system.

There are a number of great resources on the regulatory and practical aspects of the system – none better than the EU’s own:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087-20230605

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en

Please kindly read the following received from marine insurer Beazley on 13 January 2012 which observes formation of motherships for piracy attacks in Nigerian waters.


Nigeria: Suspicious observation far offshore - motherships now probably in use

Observation made by commercial vessel on 12 Jan 2012:Vessel sighted fishing trawler in position 01 36.70 N 002 58.6 E at 1620 hrs LT, 5 nM from a commercial bulk carrier.

Position given is in international waters, 312 Nm WSW Bonny (305 Nn S Lagos).

The observation report states that the trawler “probably was not a pirate mothership” but acted suspiciously as it drew closer, then stopped about 5 Nm from the bulk carrier. “After 30 minutes they deployed 2 small boats (skiff type) from the aft of the trawler and were approaching the bulk carrier.”

The bulk carrier immediately started engines at 1630 hrs LT and commenced shifting position. She got away without incident.

COMMENT: Under normal circumstances we would not have reported this. But given recent indications of mothership activity off Nigeria we decided it deserved attention.Recent indicators that the use of fishing boats and other vessels are being used as staging platforms for attacks and other illegal activity (oil theft) are:

- Attacks 60-80 nM off Bonny on SPAR RIGEL, NEDLOYD TESLIN and local trawler RESTORER on 9 and 10 Jan.

- Attacks 90-140 nM off Lagos on DESERT VOYAGER (30 Oct); unknown chemical tanker (2 Oct); ROSAS TOMASOS (3 Nov); CAPE BIRD (8 OCT); MINNA (18 Dec) between October and December.

- Nigerian trawler owners raised alarm, in August, of an increasing number of fishing boats being hijacked for criminal purposes.

- The Nigeria Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) issued a warning, in early December, to indigenous shipping companies to be careful while chartering their vessels out as oil thieves have been discovered to be renting indigenous ships to commit crimes on Nigerian waters.

RELEVANCE:There are now good reasons to assume that maritime criminals have extended their reach offshore Nigeria and masters/owners should take measures to counter this threat.RECOMMENDATION: Heed the current IMB warning: “All vessels are advised to maintain strict anti piracy watches and measures and report all attacks and suspicious sightings to the IMB Piracy Reporting Centre. These official attack reports are also crucial to request the relevant Authorities to beef up patrols and stop the menace in the area.” Tel. +603 2078 5763 /  +603 2031 0014 ; Fax No: +603 2078 5769; Email: piracy@icc-ccs.org  / imbkl@icc-ccs.org

No items found.