CircularsNews
June 2017

West Sahara Disputes

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was extended to cover emissions from shipping as of 1st January 2024.

The EU ETS is limited by a 'cap' on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall.

Each allowance gives the holder the right to emit:

  • One tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or;
  • The equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
  • The price of one ton of CO2 allowance under the EU ETS has fluctuated between EUR 60 and almost EUR 100 in the past two years. The total cost of emissions will vary based on the cost of the allowance at the time of purchase, the vessel’s emissions profile and the total volume of voyages performed within the EU ETS area. The below is for illustration purposes:
  • ~A 30.000 GT passenger ship has total emissions of 20.000 tonnes in a reporting year, of which 9.000 are within the EU, 7.000 at berth within the EU and 4.000 are between the EU and an outside port. The average price of the allowance is EUR 75 per tonne. The total cost would be as follows:
  • ~~9.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 675.000
  • ~~7.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 525.000
  • ~~4.000 * EUR 75 * 50% = EUR 150.000
  • ~~Total = EUR 1.350.000 (of which 40% is payable in 2024)
  • For 2024, a 60% rebate is admitted to the vessels involved. However, this is reduced to 30% in 2025, before payment is due for 100% with effect from 2026.
  • Emissions reporting is done for each individual ship, where the ship submits their data to a verifier (such as a class society) which in turns allows the shipowner to issue a verified company emissions report. This report is then submitted to the administering authority, and it is this data that informs what emission allowances need to be surrendered to the authority.
  • The sanctions for non- compliance are severe, and in the case of a ship that has failed to comply with the monitoring and reporting obligations for two or more consecutive reporting periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure compliance, the competent authority of an EEA port of entry may issue an expulsion order. Where such a ship flies the flag of an EEA country and enters or is found in one of its ports, the country concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the company fulfils its monitoring and reporting obligations.
  • Per the EU’s Implementing Regulation, it is the Shipowner who remains ultimately responsible for complying with the EU ETS system.

There are a number of great resources on the regulatory and practical aspects of the system – none better than the EU’s own:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087-20230605

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en

As a lot of you aware that the dispute about the Western Sahara became an important issue after Spain left the territory. Morocco and The Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic have a big conflict about the territory and the phosphate mines. Some parts of the ''Western Sahara'' is part of the Moroccan territory including two main ports which are Dakhal port and Layoune port. UN does not recognize The Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic and also Morocco's claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara is not recognized by any state, nor by the UN.  So that the main issue is who is the owner of the mines and the products being produced in those mines.

It has become a significant topic in shipping industry after the large motor vessel NM Cherry Blossom has been detained in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, on 15 June 2017. The High Court stated that the ship, carrying conflict minerals from occupied Western Sahara, is to remain there until a trial concludes on the real ownership of the cargo. The most important thing about this detainment is that, the charterer of this transport named Furness Withy a London/Melbourne based dry cargo ship operating and brokering company which is part of German company Hamburg Süd. This entity is in turn wholly owned by the Oetker Group, particularly known internationally for its Dr.Oetker frozen pizzas.

Furthermore, On 14 March 2017, the Oetker Group announced an agreement to sell its subsidiary Hamburg Süd to Danish company Maersk. Moreover, recently another vessel owned by ULTRABULK (The Danish shipping company) and chartered by OCP (OCP SA is a Moroccan state-owned company, which since 1975 has been in operation of the mine in Western Sahara through its subsidiary Phosphates de Boucraa S.A.) was detained by Panama jurisdiction when crossing the Panama Canal but immediately released in line with the international law.

To sum up, WSRW (Western Sahara Resource Watch) calls on all companies involved in the transports to immediately halt all shipments of Western Sahara phosphate until a solution to the conflict has been found. Investorsare requested to engage or divest unless action is taken. Some of the clubs' Moroccan correspondents recommended that prevent calling the ''South Africa'' when carrying OCP  cargoes from Laayoune or  Dakhla ports  as they would be  arrested/detained.

No items found.