CircularsNews
February 2010

İran - İran'ın dahil olduğu ticari faaliyetleri hedef alan ABD/İngiltere mevcut ve bekleyen yasama faaliyetleri

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was extended to cover emissions from shipping as of 1st January 2024.

The EU ETS is limited by a 'cap' on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall.

Each allowance gives the holder the right to emit:

  • One tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or;
  • The equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
  • The price of one ton of CO2 allowance under the EU ETS has fluctuated between EUR 60 and almost EUR 100 in the past two years. The total cost of emissions will vary based on the cost of the allowance at the time of purchase, the vessel’s emissions profile and the total volume of voyages performed within the EU ETS area. The below is for illustration purposes:
  • ~A 30.000 GT passenger ship has total emissions of 20.000 tonnes in a reporting year, of which 9.000 are within the EU, 7.000 at berth within the EU and 4.000 are between the EU and an outside port. The average price of the allowance is EUR 75 per tonne. The total cost would be as follows:
  • ~~9.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 675.000
  • ~~7.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 525.000
  • ~~4.000 * EUR 75 * 50% = EUR 150.000
  • ~~Total = EUR 1.350.000 (of which 40% is payable in 2024)
  • For 2024, a 60% rebate is admitted to the vessels involved. However, this is reduced to 30% in 2025, before payment is due for 100% with effect from 2026.
  • Emissions reporting is done for each individual ship, where the ship submits their data to a verifier (such as a class society) which in turns allows the shipowner to issue a verified company emissions report. This report is then submitted to the administering authority, and it is this data that informs what emission allowances need to be surrendered to the authority.
  • The sanctions for non- compliance are severe, and in the case of a ship that has failed to comply with the monitoring and reporting obligations for two or more consecutive reporting periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure compliance, the competent authority of an EEA port of entry may issue an expulsion order. Where such a ship flies the flag of an EEA country and enters or is found in one of its ports, the country concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the company fulfils its monitoring and reporting obligations.
  • Per the EU’s Implementing Regulation, it is the Shipowner who remains ultimately responsible for complying with the EU ETS system.

There are a number of great resources on the regulatory and practical aspects of the system – none better than the EU’s own:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087-20230605

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en

Sayın İlgili,

Aşağıdaki sirküler Uluslararası Grup Klupleriden Skuld tarafından 17 Şubat 2010 tarihinde yayınlanmış olup diğer tüm Grup klupleri benzer içerikli sirküler yayınlamıştır. Burada ABD ve Birleşik Krallık'ın İran'a ambargo planları ve neticesinde P&I teminatına etkilerinden bahsetmektedir.

Eğer kanunlar gerçeklerşirse Iran'a rafine petrol taşımacılığında rol oynamış ABD vatandaşı tarafların (şahıs veya kuruluş) ambargoyu ihlalle suçlanması söz konusu.  Bu taraflar arasına yasa kesinleşirse armatör, kiracı, işletmeci, mürettebat, klup, reasürerler, brokerler, finansörlerin dahil olması beklenmektedir.

P&I açısından Grup Klupleri böyle bir yasanın geçmesi halinde Grup Kluplerinin sorumlu tutulacağından endişe edilmektedirler.  Şu anda kesinleşmiş bir durum olmadığı için 2010/11 poliçe şartlarına olası bir müeyyide ile ilgili kural getirilmemiştir ancak yıl içersinde Klup yönetim kurullarının poliçede değişiklik yapma hakkına sahip oldukları belirtilmektedir. Netice itibarı ile İran'a petrol taşıyan gemilerin teminat dışı bırakılması gerçekleşebilir.

2009 Ekim ayında UK Financial Services Authority ve 15 Ocak 2010'da Bermuda the Anti-Terrorism (Financial Restrictions Iran) Order 2010 kanunları gereği İran Devlet filosu Grup Kluplerince sigortalanamamaktadır.

Klupler kira anlaşmaları ve konşimentolar için önerilecek klozlar üzerinde çalışmakta olduklarını belirtmektedirler.

-----------------

Published 17.02.2010

New sanctions are likely to be introduced as a response to the Iranian government's continuing uranium enrichment programme.  Legislative developments are being closely monitored by the International Group and can be summarised as follows.

1. US legislation

A number of Iranian shipping companies (including IRISL and a number of its subsidiary and affiliated companies) are already "specially designated" by theUS Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"). The effect of this designation is to prohibit dealings by US persons (which would include provision of insurance services) with these companies. This prohibition is specifically targeted at the activities of identified Iranian companies and their vessels and does not extend to the wider shipowning community.

Of greater concern and potential impact is proposed legislation to amend the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 to enhance US diplomatic efforts with respect to Iran and expanding economic sanctions against Iran.

Two pending bills entitled the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act ("IRPSA") will, if passed, impose sanctions focused specifically on the exportation of refined petroleum products to Iran. One bill is in the Senate and the other in the House of Representatives.  A reconciliation process is taking place which will determine the final text of the Act.

Under the House bill, sanctions could be imposed against both domestic and foreign entities that;

(i)

provide ships, vehicles or other means of transportation to deliver refined petroleum products to Iran, or providing services relating to the shipping or other transportation of refined petroleum products to Iran,

(ii)

underwrite or otherwise provide insurance or reinsurance for an activity described in clause (i) above, or

(iii)

financing or brokering an activity described in clause (i) above.

The Senate bill provides for the imposition of sanctions against persons who with actual knowledge provide Iran with refined petroleum resources or engage in any activity that could contribute to the enhancement of Iran's ability to import refined petroleum resources, including

(A)

providing ships or shipping services to deliver refined petroleum resources to Iran,

(B)

underwriting or otherwise providing insurance or reinsurance for such activity, or

(C)

financing or brokering such activity.

The wide drafting under both draft bills could, in relation to shipping activity, include owners, charterers, managers, crew, and, in relation to insurance cover, could include the club in which an offending vessel is entered and its reinsurers. As drafted the sanctions would apply in relation to any of the identified shipping and insurance activities relating to any vessels (regardless of country of flag, registry or beneficial ownership) trading refined products into Iran and notwithstanding that, as a matter of the law governing the relevant contracts of carriage and insurance, the adventure is lawful.

Potential sanctions for transgression could include barring sanctioned persons and companies from access to US financial institutions and blocking of assets and US dollar transactions of an offending insurer located within or routed through the United States. The Group is continuing to monitor developments in relation to the pending legislation and will report on material developments.

2. Club cover

If the bills are passed in their present form they could make a P&I Club liable to sanctions if an entered vessel is involved in the carriage of refined petroleum products to Iran. This would clearly have serious consequences for the Association and all its members.

It is not yet known if the bills will be passed and, if so, what the final wording will be.  There is also the possibility that other states or supranational organisations will impose sanctions during the coming policy year.  Since it is not at this stage known whether there will be any such legislation and, if there is, what form it will take, no changes have been made for the 2010 policy year specifically related to sanctions.  However the Board has the power to introduce rule changes during the course of the year if necessary.

3. UK legislation

The UK Financial Restrictions (Iran) Order 2009 came into effect on 12 October 2009. The material provisions of the Order prohibit the provision of insurance cover to vessels owned, controlled or operated by Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Line and as a consequence of the Order, no IRISL vessels are currently insured by Group clubs.

The Group has not been advised of any further intended action by the UK authorities in relation to insurance arrangements for other Iranian companies or in relation to trading to Iran, but depending on developments in the United States this possibility cannot be ruled out.

4. Shipowners obligations arising under contracts of carriage

The Group will liaise and coordinate with relevant shipowner associations with a view to the development of appropriate protective clauses for incorporation into charter party and bill of lading contracts.

The position in the US and elsewhere is being monitored and members will be informed of developments.

No items found.